Review existing agile documents for shareability
Closed this issue · 1 comments
afomi commented
Goal
In effort to prevent dead-end
documents (docs that are created, are valuable, but end up orphaned simply because they were not visible or on a well-worn path); review existing agile docs in Google docs and other silos, and assess each document for:
- is it valuable to the public?
- is it valuable to other agile practitioners in gov?
- does this document still need to exist?
- is it in progress?
draft
- a valuable (meaningful) artifact?
write up of a shareable agile pattern
- or the equivalent of a digital sketch that is not actionable and can be discarded)
a draft superseded by another version/fork
- is it in progress?
Acceptance
- fewer
dead-end
documents exist
Notionally
- more valuable content lives online (and is thus iterate-able online)
- more clarity on what agile documents that exist (and who they are for)
- more understanding about how information is (and isn't shared)
mgwalker commented
Closing as stale, on the assumption that the need will resurface if it still exists.