Minor issues with glossary responses

[beechnut]

Background Information

1. Charlie isn't defining T&M despite T&M being an entry in the procurement glossary.

2. When there's no longform of an acronym, the response has null where the term should be:

Implementation Steps

• Debug script to determine why T&M isn't getting caught in the lookup
• To do

Acceptance Criteria

• Charlie returns a response to @Charlie define T&M.
• Charlie's response to 1102 looks like "The term 1102 means Federal Government job series number for procurement personnel"