Consider using cli-table3 for easier output reading
hailwood opened this issue · 3 comments
Right now it can get pretty hard to follow the output from a rename action, especially when things get multiline, it would be awesome if we could get a table layout going on.
Hi.. the only minor, cosmetic issue with console tables is that they don't accept streaming input. Renamer has a streaming output, writing logs as files are renamed. If i use a table, i'd need to wait for renamer to finish its work (which could take a while on slow machines with a lot of renames) before writing a console table.
Renamer v1 will land soon which has two new output views: --view long
and --view diff
(screenshot below). Do these new views help?
Yep, I actually recently grabbed @next
after logging this issue, the new outputs are great
Would it be possible to have Renamed: ✔
hidden unless -v
is set? Given that, as far as I am aware, unless -v
is set, every item output will be renamed?
yeah, that would make sense.. i removed the Renamed: ✔
output unless the -v
flag is set, thanks. Let me know if you find anything else. You could submit a PR for --view table
if you like, shouldn't be too hard to implement.