Question: Gradient Accumulation
Closed this issue · 6 comments
Hello, does it support gradient accumulation or microbatches like those in the T5X repository? I didn't find a parameter for this in base.yml, maybe I just didn't see it? Thank you!
We don't support that out of the box. We've found that tuning LR to be smaller is a better approach.
What is your use case?
I'm training bigger models than before, so I can't use the same batch size on the same TPU. Got any recommended ablation studies on using gradient accumulation versus lowering the LR? Also, if I skip gradient accumulation, should I just linearly reduce the LR based on the batch size? Thanks!
+1
Adding another use case: considering that the availability of TPUs vary, we encounter situations where we initially train a model with a v4-128 TPU but later need to replicate the experiment with a v4-64 TPU, which has less memory. Thus, we must use gradient accumulation to maintain consistency in the results.
Simply add following code after allocation of optimizer in optimizers.py support the gradient accumulation:
if config.accumulate_gradient_steps > 1:
optimizer = optax.MultiSteps(optimizer, config.accumulate_gradient_steps)
That solution
if config.accumulate_gradient_steps > 1:
optimizer = optax.MultiSteps(optimizer, config.accumulate_gradient_steps)
should work fine, however we have added gradient accumulation as a config which should have a slightly more accurate accumulation, weighting by number of unpadded tokens
Great, thank you so much, @gobbleturk !