AICC/CMI-5_Spec_Current

Issues

• Section 8.2.3.1 Duplicate call to fetch URL. (Change SHOULD to MUST)

  #559 opened 8 years ago by MrBillMcDonald
  7

• Registration Id Requirement for All Statement Contexts

  #565 opened 7 years ago by MrBillMcDonald
  2

• Recommend Satisfied statement upon meeting moveOn criteria for an AU

  #567 opened 7 years ago by cawerkenthin
  7

• returnURL should be encoded in State

  #568 opened a year ago by cawerkenthin
  3

• Prohibition of AU using LMS specific Verbs

  #576 opened 7 years ago by MrBillMcDonald
  0

• Add cmi5 Objectives to LMS.LaunchData State document

  #589 opened 6 years ago by MrBillMcDonald
  2

• Make AU support of moveOn criteria at runtime mandatory

  #605 opened 5 years ago by MrBillMcDonald
  5

• entitlementKey data type

  #614 opened 4 years ago by cars10
  5

• 8.1/8.2 - Duplicate requirements for `fetch`

  #620 opened 4 years ago by brianjmiller
  2

• 8.2.2 auth-token definition duplicate requirements

  #622 opened 4 years ago by brianjmiller
  3

• 8.2.3.2 Allowed error-code values

  #624 opened 4 years ago by brianjmiller
  3

• 9.3.9 - SHOULD NOT issue multiple "Satsified" statements

  #630 opened 4 years ago by brianjmiller
  2

• 13.0 Section as Requirements

  #637 opened 4 years ago by brianjmiller
  2

• Relocate moveOn to contextActivities.other[]

  #600 opened a year ago by MrBillMcDonald
  2

• Working with CMI5

  #608 opened a year ago by JPCannonNew
  1

• 9.6.2.3 - Unclear need for requirement

  #633 opened 3 years ago by brianjmiller
  2

• 9.5.5.2 - Does value space imply a MUST?

  #631 opened 3 years ago by brianjmiller
  2

• 9.3.9 Satisfied - Block/Course id generation wording should be improved

  #629 opened 4 years ago by brianjmiller
  3

• 9.3 Verbs

  #628 opened 4 years ago by brianjmiller
  1

• cmi5 Adopter

  #613 opened 4 years ago by CookieCookson
  7

• 9.3 Multiple Satisfied statements per Registration

  #627 opened 4 years ago by brianjmiller
  1

• 9.1 Should the LMS be required to set the statement id

  #625 opened 4 years ago by brianjmiller
  3

• 10.0 - launchMode Normal with empty session

  #635 opened 4 years ago by brianjmiller
  1

• 8.2.1 fetch return structure

  #621 opened 4 years ago by brianjmiller
  3

• Fetch URL as single use is problematic in how the requirements read

  #623 opened 4 years ago by brianjmiller
  2

• 10.0 - requirement for activityId?

  #634 opened 4 years ago by brianjmiller
  0

• 9.6.3 - Implied Requirement

  #632 opened 4 years ago by brianjmiller
  0

• 9.2. Wording for `actor` property implies a requirement

  #626 opened 4 years ago by brianjmiller
  0

• 10.0 - launchParameters possible duplicated requirements

  #636 opened 4 years ago by brianjmiller
  1

• 7.1.3/9.6.2.1 cmi5 defined statements

  #619 opened 4 years ago by brianjmiller
  2

• Question about cmi5 spec

  #641 opened 4 years ago by ahmadichsan
  2

• 6.0/7.0

  #618 opened 4 years ago by brianjmiller
  1

• 4.3 Optional JSON Values

  #617 opened 4 years ago by brianjmiller
  1

• 3.0 Definition of LMS two requirements for LRS?

  #616 opened 4 years ago by brianjmiller
  3

• cmi5 Adopter

  #612 opened 4 years ago by barellano
  1

• Add option to use Bearer scheme instead of Basic for authentication

  #609 opened 4 years ago by ssimo3lsuhsc
  5

• CMI-5 spec questions

  #572 opened 7 years ago by Getafix-hub
  9

• AU requests from state info, how?

  #592 opened 6 years ago by ap-prog
  5

• Update of client library?

  #606 opened 4 years ago by timofeysie
  1

• cmi5 Adopter

  #604 opened 5 years ago by GrowthEngineeringLtd
  2

• Clarification of masteryScore in the context of section 10.0.

  #603 opened 5 years ago by MattyKahler
  1

• How to implement the concept of "attempt"

  #597 opened 5 years ago by sfraysse
  12

• Security In CMI-5 authentification

  #596 opened 5 years ago by jeansebbaklouti
  1

• Cmi5 sequencing

  #595 opened 6 years ago by Getafix-hub
  1

• Best Practice around actor and security token

  #593 opened 6 years ago by cawerkenthin
  2

• Definition of "Block" missing from cmi5_spec.md

  #590 opened 6 years ago by dennisvang
  1

• Is SCORM extensible?

  #588 opened 6 years ago by cawerkenthin
  2

• Does it make sense to create a CMI 5 AU when not using a LMS?

  #566 opened 7 years ago by rscharfer
  1

• Section 8.1 AU usage for activityId inconsistent with 9.4

  #556 opened 8 years ago by cawerkenthin
  1

• returnURL vs. returnUrl

  #553 opened 8 years ago by cawerkenthin
  1