§9.1.1: Datatypes definitions
Closed this issue · 1 comments
podborski commented
| Version | Source | Clause(s) |
|---|---|---|
| AOM Working Group Draft, 17 July 2023 | Apple | §9.1.1 |
Comment:
leb128() syntaxName
The way datatypes are defined seems problematic. Be consistent with other specifications of AOM (e.g. AV1)
leb128()
You should copy the definition form AV1 this one reads a bit strange. For example “the following unsigned integer” is very strange because there is no “following”.
string
Missing a word after null-terminated?
Why don’t you use the definition form ISOBMFF?
Suggestion:
Improve definitions and align with other specifications of AOM
cconcolato commented
I'm not sure I follow the comment. Can you propose concrete replacement text?