Where possible maintain naming of C++ library
Closed this issue · 1 comments
cheesema commented
e.g. min_level vs level_min
We should go for level_min, otherwise this will just create frustration, and there is little clarity gain from the first, except I agree it sounds better. (But the second aligns with the paper)
cheesema commented
Same with smoothing and error_bound, atleast for now. But its just gonna cause headaches unless they are aligned where it makes sense.