Anorov/PySocks

Should architecture specific binary test/bin/3proxy be removed?

Opened this issue · 1 comments

Hi,

I wonder whether an architecture specific binary should be present in the version control and in the release tar.gz files? The file is for Linux amd64 only. It is not usable by anybody on other architectures (e.g. Debian has 10 "official" architectures alone). And those on Linux amd64 should be sceptical about binary executables in version control and remove it anyway :~) If 3proxy is needed for testing, it should declared as requirement instead, right?

Thanks in advance!

I would also like to see 3proxy substituted for something platform neutral (or removed) as it won't work on AArch64 :/