ArtifexSoftware/urw-base35-fonts

Confusing ?commaaccent glyph names

Opened this issue · 0 comments

First, these glyph images are mapped correctly to their appropriate unicode. The issue here is the confusing glyph names, which stems form ambiguous Adobe Glyph List.

      U+015e => 266 Scedilla
      U+015f => 345 scedilla
      U+0162 => 371 Tcommaaccent
      U+0163 => 372 tcommaaccent
      U+0218 => 370 Scommaaccent
      U+0219 => 318 scommaaccent
      U+021a => 273 uni021A
      U+021b => 325 uni021B

It is more appropriate to rename U+0162 and U+0163 as Tcedilla and tcedilla.

The true ?commaaccent glyphs U+0218, U+0218, U+021A, and U+021B, could use the recommended uni-names or the descriptive commaaccent names, as long as they are consistent.