Support more forms of toplevel DRS disjunction in DRS->OWL
Opened this issue · 0 comments
Kaljurand commented
If each argument of the disjunction maps to OWL SubClassOf-axiom then they can be merged into a single SubClassOf-axiom and thus represented in OWL. See more in
http://answers.semanticweb.com/questions/22864/expressing-axiom-disjunction-in-owl