Feature request: KMAC and cShake

Question

Feature request: KMAC and cShake

paulg446 opened this issue 8 years ago · 4 comments

Any plans of implementing KMAC and cShake? http://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/SpecialPublications/NIST.SP.800-185.pdf

Given that you've already implemented Shake and SHA3, and SHA3 doesn't suffer from length-extension attacks (so HMAC is not necessary), and KMAC is the new standard, it seems like a logical progression. Anyway, great library!

Answer 1 · 2017-05-02T19:42:56.000Z

I'll have to take a look at this but I'm generally open to implementing it.

Answer 2 · 2020-04-09T11:59:16.000Z

I just reworked the whole library and released v3.0.0. I'm eyeing up implementing this and calling that v3.1.0. Assuming the stay-at-home order here is extended, I'm thinking about next week.

Answer 3 · 2020-04-13T04:45:28.000Z

As a follow-up, this is successfully implemented in the issue58 branch and pushed with c40d046. I had to make some backwards compatible API changes so I need to write a bunch more tests before merging it into master.

Answer 4 · 2020-04-15T12:21:57.000Z

Closing this with ec44570 and the imminent release of v3.1