3.1.0 - low-proof Plots (WSL) generated using --disk16
jiongxuan opened this issue · 1 comments
Hi, in the last issue(#439 ), I was using UBuntu 22.04 (real system). Then I changed a computer and used Windows 11 (WSL2 Ubuntu 22.04) and GPU drawing to generate compressed Plot, disk 16 mode, and the compression level was C1 .
Compared with directly using UBuntu 22.04, using WSL2 to Plots, the "invalid proof ratio" has decreased, but is still around 24%.
The reason for switching to WSL2 is to eliminate errors without modifying the parameters (BBCU_BUCKET_COUNT) mentioned in #276 . But so far, the effect is not ideal.
Please help me find out what is the reason and how to solve it. Thanks!
My hardware:
GPU: NVidia 2060 Desktop (6Gib vram)
RAM: 22 Gib
SSD: NVMe 1T
System: Windows 11 (WSL2 - Ubuntu 22.04)
Cuda: 12.1
Commands and logs: (Keys hidden)
./bladebit_cuda -z 1 -f b81874bf943f54db16cc94687c5081b206100c4c35c98d6d9fef93882d10afda43219b93504008cbdacd7c0fa8336dc3 -c xch109tt48vnhpq2epqufgh5j23tmf047ef4976kl9z5fpee6pq7636q9st380 cudaplot --disk-16 -t1 /mnt/c/Users/aaa/Documents/ChiaTemp /mnt/g/ChiaPlotsNew
Bladebit Chia Plotter
Version : 3.1.0
Git Commit : e9836f8
Compiled With: gcc 9.4.0
[Global Plotting Config]
Will create 1 plots.
Thread count : 8
Warm start enabled : false
NUMA disabled : false
CPU affinity disabled : false
Farmer public key : b818...
Pool contract address : xch10...
Compression Level : 1
Benchmark mode : disabled
Warning: 16G mode is experimental and still under development.
Please use the --check parameter to validate plots when using this mode.
Direct I/O not supported in 16G mode at the moment. Disabing it.
[Bladebit CUDA Plotter]
Host RAM : 11 GiB
Plot checks : disabled
Selected cuda device 0 : NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
CUDA Compute Capability : 7.5
SM count : 30
Max blocks per SM : 16
Max threads per SM : 1024
Async Engine Count : 2
L2 cache size : 3.00 MB
L2 persist cache max size : 0.00 MB
Stack Size : 1.00 KB
Memory:
Total : 6.00 GB
Free : 5.00 GB
Allocating buffers (this may take a few seconds)...
Kernel RAM required : 4828776144 bytes ( 4605.08 MiB or 4.50 GiB )
Intermediate RAM required : 4378927104 bytes ( 4176.07 MiB or 4.08 GiB )
Host RAM required : 2147483648 bytes ( 2048.00 MiB or 2.00 GiB )
Total Host RAM required : 6976259792 bytes ( 6653.08 MiB or 6.50 GiB )
GPU RAM required : 6161465344 bytes ( 5876.03 MiB or 5.74 GiB )
Allocating buffers...
Done.
Generating plot 1 / 1: 8a4ee1502ac58ce5f4035892fcf4014a447f773e667574a17041f9705967ebde
Plot temporary file: /mnt/g/ChiaPlotsNew/plot-k32-c01-2023-11-16-13-45-8a4ee1502ac58ce5f4035892fcf4014a447f773e667574a17041f9705967ebde.plot.tmp
Generating F1
Finished F1 in 176.83 seconds.
Table 2 completed in 476.27 seconds with 4294769045 entries.
Table 3 completed in 615.28 seconds with 4294632684 entries.
Table 4 completed in 727.03 seconds with 4294236853 entries.
Table 5 completed in 735.84 seconds with 4293510990 entries.
Table 6 completed in 679.44 seconds with 4292085654 entries.
Table 7 completed in 575.26 seconds with 4289181417 entries.
Finalizing Table 7
Finalized Table 7 in 245.20 seconds.
Completed Phase 1 in 4231.16 seconds
Marked Table 6 in 50.68 seconds.
Marked Table 5 in 46.70 seconds.
Marked Table 4 in 49.25 seconds.
Marked Table 3 in 50.33 seconds.
Completed Phase 2 in 196.95 seconds
Compressing Table 2 and 3...
Step 1 completed step in 468.68 seconds.
Step 2 completed step in 322.67 seconds.
Completed table 2 in 791.34 seconds with 3439308024 / 4294632684 entries ( 80.08% ).
Compressing tables 3 and 4...
Step 1 completed step in 401.96 seconds.
Step 2 completed step in 448.71 seconds.
Step 3 completed step in 257.21 seconds.
Completed table 3 in 1107.88 seconds with 3465069278 / 4294236853 entries ( 80.69% ).
Compressing tables 4 and 5...
Step 1 completed step in 245.69 seconds.
Step 2 completed step in 437.72 seconds.
Step 3 completed step in 253.68 seconds.
Completed table 4 in 937.09 seconds with 3531097905 / 4293510990 entries ( 82.24% ).
Compressing tables 5 and 6...
Step 1 completed step in 232.34 seconds.
Step 2 completed step in 419.37 seconds.
Step 3 completed step in 235.41 seconds.
Completed table 5 in 887.11 seconds with 3710423390 / 4292085654 entries ( 86.45% ).
Compressing tables 6 and 7...
Step 1 completed step in 232.02 seconds.
Step 2 completed step in 413.19 seconds.
Step 3 completed step in 243.72 seconds.
Completed table 6 in 888.94 seconds with 4289181417 / 4289181417 entries ( 100.00% ).
Serializing P7 entries
Completed serializing P7 entries in 116.58 seconds.
Completed Phase 3 in 4728.95 seconds
Completed Plot 1 in 9157.06 seconds ( 152.62 minutes )
/mnt/g/ChiaPlotsNew/plot-k32-c01-2023-11-16-13-45-8a4ee1502ac58ce5f4035892fcf4014a447f773e667574a17041f9705967ebde.plot.tmp -> /mnt/g/ChiaPlotsNew/plot-k32-c01-2023-11-16-13-45-8a4ee1502ac58ce5f4035892fcf4014a447f773e667574a17041f9705967ebde.plot
Completed writing plot in 0.24 seconds
Final plot table pointers:
Table 1: 0 ( 0x0000000000000000 )
Table 2: 1288476952 ( 0x000000004ccc9918 )
Table 3: 15287538552 ( 0x000000038f355378 )
Table 4: 29372847477 ( 0x00000006d6c21575 )
Table 5: 43726554402 ( 0x0000000a2e4e4522 )
Table 6: 58809214977 ( 0x0000000db14d6801 )
Table 7: 76244487252 ( 0x00000011c0868c54 )
C 1 : 4096 ( 0x0000000000001000 )
C 2 : 1719776 ( 0x00000000001a3de0 )
C 3 : 1719952 ( 0x00000000001a3e90 )
Final plot table sizes:
Table 1: 0.00 MiB
Table 2: 13350.55 MiB
Table 3: 13432.80 MiB
Table 4: 13688.76 MiB
Table 5: 14383.95 MiB
Table 6: 16627.57 MiB
Table 7: 16873.24 MiB
C 1 : 1.64 MiB
C 2 : 0.00 MiB
C 3 : 1227.15 MiB
./bladebit_cuda check -n 1000 /mnt/g/ChiaPlotsNew/plot-k32-c01-2023-11-16-13-45-8a4ee1502ac58ce5f4035892fcf4014a447f773e667574a17041f9705967ebde.plot
Checking 1000 random proofs with seed 0xcbbc70b37019beba1d3856b4f6cd4965ece22c5554e75fcf7af54f7bacc90f51...
Plot compression level: 1
Using GPU for decompression.
10%...
20%...
30%...
40%...
50%...
60%...
70%...
80%...
90%...
Seed used: 0xcbbc70b37019beba1d3856b4f6cd4965ece22c5554e75fcf7af54f7bacc90f51
Proofs requested/fetched: 703 / 1000 ( 70.300% )
Proof fetches failed : 10 ( 1.000% )
Proof validation failed : 243 ( 24.300% )
well, proof rate - pure random. With wsl I saw 4/30 PR and 32/30.
But always have some numbers of PFF and PVF