compression level misunderstanding
ineagu opened this issue · 1 comments
Describe the bug
After ignoring it for a while, when I gave it a fresh read I was confused by the setting name + description : https://www.dropbox.com/s/qn2otqtsn1woyko/Screenshot%202019-10-22%2010.21.07.png?dl=0
If I look at the name: "Compression Level", I assume the higher is the compression, the smaller is the image ( not sure if this is the case)
This is also confirmed by the description: "A higher compression means a loss in quality, so basically you are saying if I select high, I might lose quality.
Then when I check with the sample image thing, lower compression, results in smaller images ( lower quality).
Expected behavior
I would expect that images with higher compression results in the smallest ones.
Possible solutions:
- Keep the same slider and change the title/description :
a) Image quality
Lower image quality might not always be perceived by users and would result in a boost of your loading speed by lowering the page size. Try experimenting with the setting, then click the view sample image link to see what option works best for you.
cc @selul
🎉 This issue has been resolved in version 2.2.3 🎉
The release is available on GitHub release
Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀