MIT license?
Closed this issue · 5 comments
TomArrow commented
Hi, wanted to ask if you could add an MIT license to this. I'd like to use a part of this for a GPL2 project.
TomArrow commented
Actually nvm I just saw you got it from stackoverflow yourself.
ronnieoverby commented
Got what? Just curious what you are using in this library? AFAIK there's very little in this library I didn't write myself. Maybe some of the random extensions I think I got from Stack Overflow.
TomArrow commented
The SingleGlobalInstance one, your comment links to the stackoverflow post. I was actually trying to find if the original author posted it on github too because the stackoverflow license is so messed up and uselesss.
ronnieoverby commented
There's barely anything in that class even to license for use. It's
basically an example of how to use the Mutex class.
…On Sat, Apr 22, 2023 at 8:05 AM Tom Arrow ***@***.***> wrote:
The SingleGlobalInstance one, your comment links to the stackoverflow
post. I was actually trying to find if the original author posted it on
github too because the stackoverflow license is so messed up and uselesss.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#9 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAAYVJHZGSMLPOPEBJPW7TTXCPCQDANCNFSM6AAAAAAXHU3WZA>
.
You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID:
***@***.***>
TomArrow commented
Yea fair enough. I made my own version in the end anyway, but was feeling lazy.