Issues
- 12
METS Profile Requirement SIP2
#125 opened by stephenmackey - 0
METS CSIP related profile should be v2.2 and url should include version in order to resolve correctly.
#139 opened by stephenmackey - 5
Write descriptive release notes for specification version 2.2.0 before publication
#128 opened by jmaferreira - 4
Quotations are not being transported to the HTML rendered version of the markdown version of the spec. On the PDF is fine.
#92 opened by jmaferreira - 1
There is something broken with the "Latest" heading of the profile page of the SIP
#96 opened by jmaferreira - 3
- 1
- 9
Support for Shallow IPs
#110 opened by jmaferreira - 1
SIP19 Submitting agent Additional Information
#126 opened by stephenmackey - 4
- 1
- 8
- 0
- 0
Replace broken Travis build with GitHub actions
#119 opened by carlwilson - 2
Verify the cardinality of `metsHdr/agent/name`
#117 opened by jmaferreira - 3
- 4
`metsHdr/agent/name` is not 0..*, but 1..1
#101 opened by jmaferreira - 8
- 2
Agents indistinguishable from each other
#100 opened by jmaferreira - 1
Review the text on the webpage
#111 opened by jmaferreira - 2
Example on section 3.1 could use indentation for increased readability (PDF version only)
#93 opened by jmaferreira - 3
SIP9-31 agent ambiguities
#98 opened by koit - 1
Check that the example appendix in the METS profile is correct and follows the latest version.
#99 opened by jmaferreira - 2
"REF_CSIP_1" - Is this how it should look?
#94 opened by jmaferreira - 0
METS Profile appendix element ID's
#73 opened by karinbredenberg - 4
- 0
- 2
SIP32
#37 opened by karinbredenberg - 7
SIP32: "Follows the requirements in the CSIP profile", but CSIP does not say anything about this. Is this E-ARK specific attribute actually needed, since there is @MIMETYPE?
#24 opened by jmaferreira - 4
- 3
NOTETYPE's value not reflected in METS Extensions
#68 opened by elbre - 6
- 8
Tables: "See also” in the end of some cells is not clear, for example where does "See also: Alternative records ID's” actually refer to?
#20 opened by jmaferreira - 0
E-ARK-SIP 2.0.0
#70 opened by jmaferreira - 4
Link to extension schema
#39 opened by karinbredenberg - 1
Path to extension schema
#65 opened by karinbredenberg - 1
Wrong prefix in case of SIP14, SIP20 and SIP31?
#59 opened by elbre - 5
SIP16
#35 opened by karinbredenberg - 3
SIP10
#36 opened by karinbredenberg - 3
Chapter 3.4
#38 opened by karinbredenberg - 10
- 5
- 6
General: All extra elements for SIP, AIP and DIP should be included in CSIP
#30 opened by jmaferreira - 9
The are nulls in the auto-generated markdown
#18 opened by hsilva-keep - 1
Ch. 5.5 Appendix E: This whole appendix is unnecessary, since the document is not very large.
#23 opened by jmaferreira - 3
The cardinality of METS element SIP12 assumes that there can only be one archival creator for a SIP (Cardinality 0..1)
#25 opened by jmaferreira - 4
What is the difference between SIP12 and SIP9 on page 32-33. A bit confusing with what is meant by creator. Is it the creator of the SIP or the creator of the original information? Please clearify
#28 opened by jmaferreira - 1
- 2
The issue is repeated on page 19 in relation to the table describing fileSec (The following table describes the main differences in the fileSec between an EARK SIP and the CSIP.)
#27 opened by jmaferreira - 1
Page 11 + Page 19: The sentence just before the table says: “The following table describes the main differences in the metsHdr between an EARK SIP and the CSIP.” The use of “main” is very confusing.
#26 opened by jmaferreira