EclipseFdn/events.eclipse.org

Update content for SAMIoT 2020 Conference (Revision 1.1)-Target June 8

Closed this issue · 10 comments

phkrief commented

For this revision, we would to update the website as follow:

  • Link to registration (June 8) - in Location section (@susan will provide the link)
  • Add CFP and Submission Guidelines as hugo pages (@phkrief will provide the expected layout)
  • TPC updates (more people) - A complete list should be available June 2
  • Add link to Code of Conduct - @annejacko will provide the link.

Thanks a lot

annejacko commented

FYI Code of Conduct is ready; I updated this issue on the topic: #22

phkrief commented
  • Luca Anselma, University of Turin
  • Paolo Azzoni, Eurotech
  • Peter Bednár, Technická univerzita v Košiciach
  • Ilaria Bosi, LINKS Foundation
  • Paolo Brizzi, Competence Center Industry Manufacturing 4.0
  • Benoit Combemale, University of Toulouse INRIA
  • Davide Conzon, LINKS Foundation
  • João Pedro Correia dos Reis, Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto - FEUP
  • Maria Teresa Delgado, Eclipse Foundation
  • Frederic Desbiens, Eclipse Foundation
  • Charalampos Doukas, Amazon Web Services
  • Juliver Gil, Universidad de Antioquia
  • Laurent Gomez, SAP Security Research
  • Gil Gonçalves, Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto - FEUP
  • Marco Jahn, Eclipse Foundation
  • Prabhakaran Kasinathan, Siemens AG - Cybersecurity Technologies
  • Zakaria Laaroussi, Ericsson Finland
  • Cesar Marin, Information Catalyst for Enterprise - ICE
  • Yod Samuel Martín, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid
  • Claudio Pastrone, LINKS Foundation
  • Ivana Podnar Žarko, University of Zagreb, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computing
  • Mohammad Rifat Ahmmad Rashid, University of Liberal Arts Bangladesh – ULAB
  • Alejandra Ruiz Lopez, Tecnalia
  • Julian Schütte, Fraunhofer AISEC
  • Tomáš Sabol, Technická univerzita v Košiciach
  • Xu Tao, LINKS Foundation
  • Massimo Vecchio, Università degli Studi eCampus
  • Mark Vinkovits, Pasero
phkrief commented

@ericpoirier You should have all the inputs to update the website for its Revision 1.1

Thx a lot

phkrief commented

We have a new TPC member:

  • Alessio Angius, ISI Foundation
  • Luca Anselma, University of Turin
  • Paolo Azzoni, Eurotech
  • Peter Bednár, Technická univerzita v Košiciach
  • Ilaria Bosi, LINKS Foundation
  • Paolo Brizzi, Competence Center Industry Manufacturing 4.0
  • Benoit Combemale, University of Toulouse INRIA
  • Davide Conzon, LINKS Foundation
  • João Pedro Correia dos Reis, Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto - FEUP
  • Maria Teresa Delgado, Eclipse Foundation
  • Frederic Desbiens, Eclipse Foundation
  • Charalampos Doukas, Amazon Web Services
  • Juliver Gil, Universidad de Antioquia
  • Laurent Gomez, SAP Security Research
  • Gil Gonçalves, Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto - FEUP
  • Marco Jahn, Eclipse Foundation
  • Prabhakaran Kasinathan, Siemens AG - Cybersecurity Technologies
  • Zakaria Laaroussi, Ericsson Finland
  • Cesar Marin, Information Catalyst for Enterprise - ICE
  • Yod Samuel Martín, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid
  • Claudio Pastrone, LINKS Foundation
  • Ivana Podnar Žarko, University of Zagreb, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computing
  • Mohammad Rifat Ahmmad Rashid, University of Liberal Arts Bangladesh – ULAB
  • Alejandra Ruiz Lopez, Tecnalia
  • Julian Schütte, Fraunhofer AISEC
  • Tomáš Sabol, Technická univerzita v Košiciach
  • Xu Tao, LINKS Foundation
  • Massimo Vecchio, Università degli Studi eCampus
  • Mark Vinkovits, Pasero

@chrisguindon @ericpoirier can we still plan June 8th?
The only missing thing I'm aware of is the CoC. @annejacko any update on that? Thx a lot

autumnfound commented

I've taken on the updates for the event. I've requested access to the google docs attached.

phkrief commented

Hi @autumnfound
the TPC is the Technical Program Committee.
The TPC section of https://events.eclipse.org/2020/sam-iot/ has to be updated with the list provided in the comment #24 (comment).

HTH

phkrief commented

Quick question: I thought that the process in place was supposed to wait for a "+1" before publishing. Why is it different in this case?
Thanks

chrisguindon commented

@phkrief This is definitely needed for the initial website since I want the owner to sign-off on the website we are delivering.

I don't always require it for a revision since those are often time-sensitive. If I see something that we might not be sure, I will definitely ask for a +1.

I try to use my judgement to allow us to be efficient. If you prefer to always +1 a change, we can do that moving forward for projects that you are involved!

phkrief commented

@chrisguindon this is fine with me. I was just surprised to see the website updated w/o any request from your side to approve knowing, yes, the changes were minor on the main page but the second page was completely new.

In any case thanks fo @autumnfound for his great job to deliver it on time.

Kind regards