Biohphysical section comments
Closed this issue · 8 comments
@SlotMartijn would you know a reference to add here? to the co2 section?
Refree 2
Consider using a different words than buffering
These seem pretty straightforward.
@teixeirak , I am wondering how to structure throughout, in relation to this perspective suggested by the reviewer?
I see this as a pretty small issue that doesn't require restructuring. Let's pause on this and other biophysical revisions until we talk with Tom.
@NidhiVinod, this is a relevant re-fixation study that we can reference (it also reports on CO2 gradients within the canopy, and estimates % contribution of refixation to total understory plant CO2 uptake):
Brooks, J.R., Flanagan, L.B., Varney, G.T. and Ehleringer, J.R., 1997. Vertical gradients in photosynthetic gas exchange characteristics and refixation of respired CO2 within boreal forest canopies. Tree Physiology, 17(1), pp.1-12.
Link to the paper: https://academic.oup.com/treephys/article/17/1/1/1640508?login=true
@NidhiVinod, this is a relevant re-fixation study that we can reference (it also reports on CO2 gradients within the canopy, and estimates % contribution of refixation to total understory plant CO2 uptake): Brooks, J.R., Flanagan, L.B., Varney, G.T. and Ehleringer, J.R., 1997. Vertical gradients in photosynthetic gas exchange characteristics and refixation of respired CO2 within boreal forest canopies. Tree Physiology, 17(1), pp.1-12.
Link to the paper: https://academic.oup.com/treephys/article/17/1/1/1640508?login=true
Thanks Martijn, added to the CO2 section!
This issue can be closed