Consider dropping AtatClient trait
Closed this issue · 1 comments
MathiasKoch commented
I am not convinced the AtatClient trait brings anything to the table, that couldn't be solved using the concrete type?
Consider removing the trait entirely, in order to just make users use the concrete atat::Client type instead.
MathiasKoch commented
Closing this, as the concrete atat::Client type would involve lots of generics