Futurescaper/Futuregrapher

"Meteor" section in the README is incorrect

Closed this issue · 3 comments

It is a separate Git repository, available at https://github.com/Futurescaper/Futuregrapher.

That link points to this very repo. What does "separate" refer to?

You are right, I am not sure why I wrote that. It's removed.

Thanks! How reactive is the package? I'm considering it vs. wrapping vis.js.

No problem, thank you for taking the time to look at FutureGrapher!

The package is basically plain JS network graphing library using D3, with a
very thin Meteor-wrapper. Thus, it's not reactive per se, but reactivity is
easily obtained as you just need to call .update() from some function bound
to your Meteor collection.

I am not familiar with vis.js, but a quick look at it suggests that it
supports a greater variety of visualizations like timelines. On the other
hand, FutureGrapher seems a bit more customizable given the describer*
functions-architecture where you can affect rendering of your viz with
callbacks rather than just plain options.

On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 11:09 AM, Dan Dascalescu notifications@github.com
wrote:

Thanks! How reactive is the package? I'm considering it vs. wrapping
vis.js http://visjs.org/#network


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#9 (comment)
.