Green-Software-Foundation/carbon-aware-sdk

🎯2024-02-13 Carbon Aware SDK Meeting Agenda

Closed this issue · 11 comments

Sophietn commented

Date

2024-02-13 - 8am UTC

Meeting notices

Antitrust Policy

Linux Foundation meetings involve participation by industry competitors, and it is the intention of the Linux Foundation to conduct all of its activities in accordance with applicable antitrust and competition laws. It is therefore extremely important that attendees adhere to meeting agendas, and be aware of, and not participate in, any activities that are prohibited under applicable US state, federal or foreign antitrust and competition laws.

Examples of types of actions that are prohibited at Linux Foundation meetings and in connection with Linux Foundation activities are described in the Linux Foundation Antitrust Policy available at http://www.linuxfoundation.org/antitrust-policy. If you have questions about these matters, please contact your company counsel, or if you are a member of the Linux Foundation, feel free to contact Andrew Updegrove of the firm of Gesmer Updegrove LLP, which provides legal counsel to the Linux Foundation.

Recordings

We're happy to start recording these meetings if we receive any requests to record them.

Roll Call

Please add a comment to this issue during the meeting to denote attendance.

Full Name Affiliation GitHub username (optional)
Vaughan Knight Microsoft vaughanknight

Any untracked attendees will be added by the GSF team below

Agenda

Action Items

  • [ ]

Meeting attended by

vaughanknight commented

Attended

vaughanknight commented
image Assuming 13 Feb was the date?
  • 👍1
danuw commented

Attended

nttDamien commented

Attended

Willmish commented

Attended
Agenda suggestion:

  • 👍1
YaSuenag commented

Attended

devidayalhclteam commented

Attended

Willmish commented

Adding a warning here: https://github.com/Green-Software-Foundation/carbon-aware-sdk/blob/dev/docs/configuration.md#datasources

Warning: Do not do this in production environment

or something like that

danuw commented
  • Documentation PR review - can everyone have a look and leave a comment before the next meeting on whether they are happy with the new site and layout or if there are any particular concerns
    • @Sophietn - no outstanding tasks for graduation apart some reviews - we will let you know once ready, but we can probably start the process cc @vaughanknight
  • conversation between NTT data and @vaughanknight about prometheus - agreed way forward (.net 8 migration PRs first)
  • quick replay of the interactions with IF team and UCL
  • review OpenSSF Badge criteria: #464 (comment)
    • for now we have 2 main concerns flagged with with warnings - We will address with following actions:
      • @Willmish add a comment to ensure we do not recommend storing secrets in app settings
      • Reenabling codecov tracked here #445
    • @Willmish to check what needs to happen to get the badge with @Sophietn
  • 👍1
Willmish commented

@Sophietn just FYI as this is now merged (#464 (comment)), if we want to have a openSSF best practices badge this will need to be submitted for review here: https://www.bestpractices.dev/en/projects . But I guess this will have to be done by OC after their review?

  • 👍1
Sophietn commented

image Assuming 13 Feb was the date?

@vaughanknight Yes typo sorry! Good to see we're on track for Graduating soon. Let me know once you're ready and we can prepare to raise an issue on the OC repo showcasing the project's fulfilment of the Graduation acceptance criteria.

@Willmish Thanks again for your work to review us against the Open SSF Best Practice Badge. I've added a comment on that PR so we save the effort you put in on our docs. We don't need the badge to graduate, but if the project team would like it, I'd suggest waiting to raise that once we've graduated within GSF.