GreenmaskIO/greenmask

Container image

Closed this issue · 6 comments

0dragosh commented

It would be great if greenmask were also released as a minimal container image, preferably hosted on GitHub’s feee container registry ghcr.io.

wwoytenko commented

Hi! Thank you for your message. Could you please clarify what should be included in the lightweight container? Are you suggesting using Alpine? Also, could you explain why you prefer GitHub Registry over Docker Hub?

Thank you.

0dragosh commented

Hello! I couldn't find a container image for greenmask in the documentation, maybe there is one and I'm just unaware? Sorry for not starting with that.

As for what should be in the image just what the application needs and the binary itself I guess. Alpine is fine, or just starting from the regular upstream go container.

The reason I suggested GHCR as opposed to Docker Hub rate limits everyone while GitHub's free container registry does not. For open source projects like this it's very easy to just use ghcr.io.

wwoytenko commented

Thank you for the clarification. I've noted the information about the GitHub registry, and we might consider publishing builds there as well.

I couldn't find a container image for greenmask in the documentation

Yes, you're correct—there's no information on the Installation page I will fix it. However, the image already exists and can be found on Docker Hub:
Greenmask Docker Image

Alpine is fine

Noted as well.

Thanks!

  • 👍1
sraka1 commented

@wwoytenko the Docker image seems very out of date (3mo old), as does the latest release in GH releases? Any plans for a new release with the subset changes?

wwoytenko commented

@sraka1
The v0.2b2 version, incorporating the latest changes (including subset), is scheduled for release at the end of August, approximately between the 29th and 30th.

wwoytenko commented

@sraka1 the v0.2.0b2 was published, so the latest version of the container is available