- Presented at the AAAI 2019 conference in Honolulu, Hawaii on January 27, 2019.
- Applied in the Best Paper Award of the EDM 2019 conference in Montreal, Canada on July 2, 2019.
See our article: Knowledge Tracing Machines: Factorization Machines for Knowledge Tracing [pdf] [slides].
Comments are always welcome!
@inproceedings{Vie2019,
Author = {{Vie}, Jill-J{\^e}nn and {Kashima}, Hisashi},
Booktitle = {Proceedings of the 33th {AAAI} Conference on Artificial Intelligence},
Title = {{Knowledge Tracing Machines: Factorization Machines for Knowledge Tracing}},
Pages = {750--757},
Url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/1811.03388},
Year = 2019}
Authors: Jill-Jênn Vie, Hisashi Kashima
Presented at the Optimizing Human Learning workshop in Kingston, Jamaica on June 4, 2019.
Slides from the tutorial are available here. A notebook on Colab will be available "soon", but the priority is to have tests in this repository.
The tutorial makes you play with the models to assess weak generalization. To assess strong generalization and reproduce the experiments of the paper, you want to look at how folds are created in dataio.py.
python3 -m venv venv
. venv/bin/activate
pip install -r requirements.txt # Will install numpy, scipy, pandas, scikit-learn, pywFM
If you also want to get the factorization machines running (KTM for d > 0), you should also do:
make libfm
Select a dataset and the features you want to include.
data/<dataset>/data.csv
should contain the following columns:
user, item, skill, correct, wins, fails
where wins and fails are the number of successful and unsuccessful attempts at the corresponding skill.
data/<dataset>/needed.csv
needs to contain:
user_id, item_id, correct
(Note the difference.)
And data/<dataset>/q_mat.npz
should be a q-matrix under scipy.sparse
format.
If you want to compute wins and fails like in PFA or DAS3H,
you should run encode_tw.py
instead of this file, with the --pfa
option for PFA or --tw
for DAS3H.
python encode.py --users --items # To get the encodings (npz)
python lr.py data/dummy/X-ui.npz # To get results (txt)
You can also download the Assistments 2009 dataset into data/assistments09
and change the dataset:
python encode.py --dataset assistments09 --skills --wins --fails # Will encode PFA sparse features into X-swf.npz
If you are lazy, you can also just do make
and try to understand what is going on in the Makefile.
Choffin et al. proposed the DAS3H model, and we implemented it using queues. This code is faster than the original KTM encoding.
To prepare a dataset like Assistments, see examples in the data
folder.
Skill information should be available either as skill_id
, or skill_ids
separated with ~~
, or in a q-matrix q_mat.npz
.
python encode_tw.py --dataset dummy_tw --tw # Will encode DAS3H sparse features into X.npz
Then you can run lr.py
or fm.py
, see below.
If you want to encode PFA features:
python encode.py --skills --wins --fails # Will create X-swf.npz
For logistic regression:
python lr.py data/dummy/X-swf.npz
# Will save weights in coef0.npy
For factorization machines of size d = 5:
python fm.py --d 5 data/dummy/X-swf.npz
# Will save weights in w.npy and V.npy
NEW! For an online MIRT model:
python omirt.py --d 0 data/assist09/needed.csv # Will load LR: coef0.npy
python omirt.py --d 5 data/assist09/needed.csv # Will load FM: w.npy and V.npy
# Will train a IRT model on Fraction dataset with learning rate 0.01
python omirt.py --d 0 data/fraction/needed.csv --lr 0.01 --lr2 0.
NEW! For an IRT or deeper model with Keras, for batching and early stopping:
python dmirt.py data/assist09/needed.csv
It will also create a model.png file with the architecture (here just IRT with L2 regularization):
On the Assistments 2009 dataset:
AUC time | users + items | skills + wins + fails | items + skills + wins + fails |
---|---|---|---|
LR | 0.734 (IRT) 2s | 0.651 (PFA) 9s | 0.737 23s |
FM d = 20 | 0.730 2min9s | 0.652 43s | 0.739 2min30s |
Computation times are given for a i7 with 2.6 GHz, with 200 epochs of FM training.
On the Assistments 2009 dataset:
Model | Dimension | AUC | Improvement |
---|---|---|---|
KTM: items, skills, wins, fails, extra | 5 | 0.819 | |
KTM: items, skills, wins, fails, extra | 5 | 0.815 | +0.05 |
KTM: items, skills, wins, fails | 10 | 0.767 | |
KTM: items, skills, wins, fails | 0 | 0.759 | +0.02 |
(DKT (Wilson et al., 2016)) | 100 | 0.743 | +0.05 |
IRT: users, items | 0 | 0.691 | |
PFA: skills, wins, fails | 0 | 0.685 | +0.07 |
AFM: skills, attempts | 0 | 0.616 |
On the Duolingo French dataset:
Model | Dimension | AUC | Improvement |
---|---|---|---|
KTM | 20 | 0.822 | +0.01 |
DeepFM | 20 | 0.814 | +0.04 |
Logistic regression + L2 reg | 0 | 0.771 |
We also showed that Knowledge Tracing Machines (Bayesian FMs) got better results than Deep Factorization Machines on the Duolingo dataset. See our article: Deep Factorization Machines for Knowledge Tracing and poster at the BEA workshop at New Orleans, LA on June 5, 2018.
@inproceedings{Vie2018,
Author = {{Vie}, Jill-J{\^e}nn},
Booktitle = {{Proceedings of the Thirteenth Workshop on Innovative Use of NLP for Building Educational Applications}},
Pages = {370--373},
Title = {{Deep Factorization Machines for Knowledge Tracing}},
Url = {http://arxiv.org/abs/1805.00356},
Year = 2018}