Potentially overly centralized, but interesting.
hitchhiker opened this issue · 1 comments
Regarding "We the People" 0ab6fd6 - great effort, genuinely lovely idea.
I would suggest that these entities "Senate" and "House of Representatives" seem to have extraordinarily elevated permissions. I understand you intend them to marshall resources, allocate permissions on behalf of "The People" but what's to stop a runaway condition, an accumulation of power? This is essentially a classical centralized heirarchy.
Your intention to create a "more perfect Union" is noble, but what's to guarentee "The People" will ultimately retain any form of representation in this structure? A reasonably well organized attack on any of the principal nodes (or inter-process comms) would result in the entire system being overwhelmed and overrun by malicious actors (with or without local permissions). "The People" would become subserviant to this system - IMHO it's just not going to remain distributed in the way you are intending.
Time will tell. Not convinced, perhaps you need to decentralize more. gl hf!
If you can specify specific improvements then additional evaluation can be done to decentralize. Congressional bills welcome.