JizhiziLi/AIM

Question about the results for DIM+Trimap

XavierCHEN34 opened this issue · 1 comments

I've test my trimap based model on AIM-500. However, the results are much better that reported in your paper. It is reasonable that trimap-based models have advantages over trimap-free ones.
I wonder that if you did not fuse the foreground and background labels provided by the trimap during test.

Hi there,

Thanks for showing interest in our work. Please note that this work is focused on trimap-free matting methods. Thus, for fair comparison, we trained and tested the trimap-based methods with our unified semantic representation (unimap/duomap/trimap), which may cause a gap with the conventional implementations using the traditional trimaps. I will upload the trimaps used as the inputs for trimap-based methods on AIM-500 soon, where you can have a try with. Thanks!

Cheers,
Jizhizi Li