LR-87 Diameter of 3m instead of 1.53 / 1.14m
Opened this issue · 3 comments
westlakem commented
The LR87 had a diameter of 1.53m and 1.14m (depending on the variant) but the VAB shows them all as 3m.
Aerobee on a 1m diameter probe core
LR87 on a 1m diameter probe core
Vessel with 1.7m diameter boosters (6.5m total length)
Vessel with 1.7m diameter boosters + LR87 engines (7.8m total length)
Capkirk123 commented
This appears to be because the Engineer's Report can still see parts of a model hidden by B9PS. The BDB LR87 model has a 3-meter mount which is hidden by ROEngines and B9PS, but still causes the Engineer's Report to report it as 3 meters wide.
The issue should probably be resolved by getting B9PS to hide the bounds of disabled models better.
al2me6 commented
The fundamental issue is that KSP doesn't care about whether a transform is enabled or not when calculating bounds, so there's not much else B9PS can do. We'll have to clobber the computation in KSPCF.
…On Oct 15 2023, at 8:28 pm, Capkirk123 ***@***.***> wrote:
This appears to be because the Engineer's Report can still see parts of a model hidden by B9PS. The BDB LR87 model has a 3-meter mount which is hidden by ROEngines and B9PS, but still causes the Engineer's Report to report it as 3 meters wide.
The issue should probably be resolved by getting B9PS to hide the bounds of disabled models better.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub (#219 (comment)), or unsubscribe (https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AINB675SQWDBLLECGREIT33X7R5TVAVCNFSM6AAAAAA4SO5UMCVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMYTONRTGU2TKNZWGM).
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.