Deprecated Member functions imports
Closed this issue · 2 comments
In the contex of https://registry.khronos.org/SYCL/specs/sycl-2020/html/sycl-2020.html#table.members.platform
Should we keep Deprecated functions(e.g has_extension) with appropriate comments or totally remove from guide?
One more question regarding organization in chapter(e.g Runtime Classes->Platforms: https://registry.khronos.org/SYCL/specs/sycl-2020/html/sycl-2020.html#sec:platform-class) :
Should we following content and order from revision 7 in all tables or keep like before?
Our recommendation to following tables :
https://registry.khronos.org/SYCL/specs/sycl-2020/html/sycl-2020.html#table.constructors.platform
https://registry.khronos.org/SYCL/specs/sycl-2020/html/sycl-2020.html#table.members.platform
https://registry.khronos.org/SYCL/specs/sycl-2020/html/sycl-2020.html#table.staticmembers.platform
Are you asking whether there should be different sub-section headings for "platforms":
- constructors
- member functions
- static member functions
?
Yes, I think this makes sense. I'd add another sub-section too, though:
- constructors
- member functions
- static member functions
- information descriptors