no coverage?
Closed this issue · 5 comments
The problem
You are running unit tests without coverage.
Fair point, but I want to keep things simple. People using the boilerplate, me including, can integrate a coverage tool by their taste. I'll leave that choice to them. Also, most of the example code would most definitely change or be removed, so adding more tests to keep a high % of coverage, that will later be deleted seems like unnecessary extra work.
its your call, however i want to point out that there is no need to keep the % high for a boilerplate. Also, having nyc for coverage will keep things super simple.
I've thought about it this morning and you have a point - nyc is super simple to integrate and would indeed benefit the project. I may end up adding it after all. 😉
I'm reopening the issue.
i can submit a pull request
That would be great!