Comments on special surveys chapter from Niel Brandt

[michaelstrauss]

This is part of the SAC review of the white paper. He writes:

There is some potentially great stuff in this chapter, and it was
good to re-read it. But overall it reads as a bit of a hodgepodge
presently, and there is a lot of work to be done here.

special-surveys-chapter-feedback01.pdf

[drphilmarshall]

Thanks Michael. I can't argue with @nielbrandt 's overall assessment! I'll talk to @bethwillman and @ivezic about how to address the hodgepodge nature of the chapter, and report back to this thread. I suspect we can come up with a more coherent structure now we know more about the overall timeline of the observing strategy process, and how "mini-surveys" fit in to that.

[ivezic]

Good comments, and it shouldn't take too much work to address them.
It seems that we should make sure that the following coauthors are aware of these comments:

• David Trilling and Lynne Jones @davidtrilling @rhiannonlynne
• Chris Stubbs @astrostubbs
• Suzanne Hawley, Ruth Angus, Jim Davenport @suzannehawley @RuthAngus @jimdavenport

[davidtrilling]

i'm on it and will coordinate with lynne. david

…

On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 1:37 PM, Zeljko Ivezic ***@***.***> wrote: Good comments, and it shouldn't take too much work to address them. It seems that we should make sure that the following coauthors are aware of these comments: - David Trilling and Lynne Jones @davidtrilling <https://github.com/davidtrilling> @rhiannonlynne <https://github.com/rhiannonlynne> - Chris Stubbs @astrostubbs <https://github.com/astrostubbs> - Suzanne Hawley, Ruth Angus, Jim Davenport @suzannehawley @RuthAngus <https://github.com/ruthangus> @jimdavenport <https://github.com/jimdavenport> — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#614 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ANRJB_cjC0Bf9SGW_KJEBu4S9eyv2rL9ks5r9JUIgaJpZM4NBwLI> .

[drphilmarshall]

I see David and Lynne's changes, thanks! I added some explanatory text at the start of the chapter to mitigate hodgepodginess, and cross-referenced the twilight solar system survey with Stubbs' more general twilight observing section. I think this should pass muster now! Thanks everyone.