Inconsistency of the number in the dataset
Ydongd opened this issue · 2 comments
Ydongd commented
It seems that the number of the human-annotated dataset is inconsistent with the description in the paper.
The number of the human-annotated set is 5,051 in the paper, which is 4,003 in the released data. This inconsistency leads to overlap in the 2nd fine-tuned data and the evaluation data.
Is there something missed?
Looking forward to your response!
kausainshah commented
Hi @Ydongd,
I am also facing same issue. Any progress or update on this?
LengSicong commented
There are data samples where one floorplan corresponds to multiple language description annotations, which leads to inconsistency.