Variants of ,sra

[ExplosiveRunes]

Unless the GM is rolling all the attacks, the player probably wont know the evade and soak of the target. Variants of the ,sra command that roll just just the attack and spits out damage and a separate one that takes in hits and damage and rolls evade and soak might be useful.

[Lokathor]

Fox had a similar concern about the possible use of Edge in the middle of the sequence.

There are certainly dramatic moments where the player might not know the defenses of the target, or the ultimate results might want to be hidden. In those cases, the player could just type 0 as the value for evade or soak and it'd still print the results of each step, and then the GM can fill in the gaps.

I'll try to keep it in mind as we go, and maybe add something later, so I'll just leave this as an open issue for a while.