clarify naming scheme for getters / setters
Lokathor opened this issue · 2 comments
Lokathor commented
We've got a number of getters and settters, and the names have become a little less consistent.
extract_i16_as_i32_m128i! should probably be "get" like the rest.
Also some of the "getters" don't get raw data they do a round, so that should be a "convert" maybe.
Naming is a mess.
--
Our naming rules are...
- "cast" preserves the exact bit patterns involved.
- ... ?