Agree on software licence
Opened this issue · 2 comments
andrewphilipsmith commented
(This issue replaces https://github.com/Maria-Liakata-NLP-Group/timeline_selection/issues/17)
I have added the MIT License (which is Turing's default licence)
- Confirm that the MIT license is OK will PI
- Confirm whether or not individual contributors need to be named in the copyright notice? Or is it sufficient to just name the two institutions (The Alan Turing Institute, Queen Mary University of London)?
andrewphilipsmith commented
@andrewphilipsmith To ask REG for previous examples of software released when PhD students have done the majority of the development
@maria to check with QMUL on their policy.
andrewphilipsmith commented
Two relevant resources:
- Discussion of "Academic use only" licences - https://alan-turing-institute.github.io/rse-course/html/module06_software_projects/06_07_software_licensing.html#academic-use-only
- A draft chapter of the Turing Way - "How do you make your Open Source project sustainable? [working title]" the-turing-way/the-turing-way#2360