Thermal Expansion ID should be "CoFHLib"

Question

Thermal Expansion ID should be "CoFHLib"

Closed this issue 10 years ago · 3 comments

Also, the RF APIs should activate without TE present - not everyone uses RF with TE (see: me).

Answer 1 · 2014-08-31T07:42:35.000Z

Uhh, it is? Unless you mean for MC 1.6, where that won't work because it's not using the API annotation there. At least it didn't in all the versions I checked? If anything, CoFHCore would maybe applicable there, I guess?

Answer 2 · 2014-08-31T08:07:10.000Z

Oh, sorry, I accidentally checked the 1.6 repo instead. I'm an idiot.

But the "RF APIs activating without CoFHLib or TE present" should still be done, as RF, by design, can be included by any mod (and many people have RF support without CoFHLib!). I think the CoFH RF API has its own API package name, too.

Answer 3 · 2014-08-31T10:30:26.000Z

Ah, you mean split up the mods.thermalexpansion package into several packages / modules, for each part of the CoFH APIs? Yeah, makes sense I guess.