Feature Request: Grab Extensions & Extensions Data folders
rolltidehero opened this issue · 5 comments
This would be a great addition to the Grabber and will allow you to add their extensions and extension settings.
Hell, why not just grab the whole User Data folder 😂
I know it could be a large file, but most of us have gigabit connections and can handle it. 👍
I'll try to contribute as much as I can, but I work 60 hours a week, plus I try to do freelance work in my free time to earn some extra money.
But thanks for taking over this project and continuing it, because I think it has a lot of potential.
This would be a great addition to the Grabber and will allow you to add their extensions and extension settings.
It is already certain that extensions will be added. I am already working on this feature but I will need to research a little deeper to get a better understanding of extensions. I can't guarantee that it's gonna be in the next update tho...
Hell, why not just grab the whole User Data folder 😂
haha yea. Currently im focusing on browser information data and not on actual files but maybe im gonna add it in future. Maybe something like List<fileName, content> GrabbedFiles;? Right now I've got more important things to do for the next updates like: improving/optimizing code, adding functions that will replace the necessary packages so you won't need thoose annoying DLL's, and fixing bugs like the current (Firefox decryption doesn't work).
Also im trying to add a UnitTest Project (CockyGrabber.Test) to test all function at once if you know what that is. Hopefully it will help to analyse future errors and bugs
I'll try to contribute as much as I can, but I work 60 hours a week, plus I try to do freelance work in my free time to earn some extra money.
That would be very kind of you! Anything helps. I don't necessarily need help at major stuff but it would be grate if you could improve some minor stuff that would maybe affect the performance like unneeded variables and statements; Or just adding some unknown browsers. anything would help.
But thanks for taking over this project and continuing it, because I think it has a lot of potential.
thanks and np.
This will need to wait for v2.3.0 since I didn't have had enough time to add it in v2.2.0
It seems like I need to research a little deeper to understand extensions. This feature will need to wait for v2.4.0
add a feature to search for certian files for example wallet.dat etc
add a feature to search for certian files for example wallet.dat etc
Please create a separate issue for that suggestion, but since we're already here, I might as well answer:
No. CockyGrabber specializes in information decryption, so the user doesn't have to understand deeper processes. Its goal is the simplification of browser information grabbing. If you want to search for or read specific files, then you can just use System.IO. I don't understand why you would suggest something as easy as that.