Support Iterable[(String, String)] in ? operator
Opened this issue · 2 comments
acjay commented
Why not also allow ?
and &
accept an Iterable
of pairs? That would be more in fitting with the dsl than addParams
.
theon commented
Makes sense. I can add a overloaded version of ?
and &
.
theon commented
I need to revisit this. I think I need to audit all the parameter and return types and make sure they are sensible.
There was a recent twitter conversation about this where the consensus for return types was that they should be as specific as possible. There were mixed views on parameters types.