Latency under bs=1 seems not impressive like throughput under bs=128.
TsingWei opened this issue · 2 comments
TsingWei commented
Latency under bs=1 seems not impressive like throughput under bs=128.
tmanh commented
I also observe the same thing, SwinV2 is faster than FasterViT when the batch size is small (1-6 images). But, when the batch size become larger FasterVit is much faster than SwinV2 (>= 10 images).
ahatamiz commented
Our model has been designed for bs=128. However, in the updated arxiv manuscript, we have provided more comparisons for different hardware.