Configure methods -- choose which?
NaitLee opened this issue · 2 comments
NaitLee commented
Currently PHFS is using a simple ini configure method for development.
Other choices:
- An INI generator with a command line interface
- An INI generator with a windowed interface, which will be a separate program/repo
- An INI generator with a web interface, view it with browser at location
/~ - A command-line-window interface, I think few ones like
- A full featured web interface that is familiar with original HFS
- A full featured, separate windowed interface that is familiar with original HFS
Pros/Cons:
| INI file | Command line | Windowed interface | Web interface | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| User friendly | ❓ | ❌ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Flexibility | ✅ | ❌ | ❌ | ✅ |
| Modernity | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ✅ |
| Simplicity | ✅ | ✅ | ❌ | ❌ |
Which pro would you prefer?
delgh1 commented
I vote A full featured, separate windowed interface that is familiar with original HFS.
Side note: with spacing and comments, editing an ini file is not too bad either.
NaitLee commented
Thank you for suggestions 😘
Also I'm doing Visual Studio & C# these days. It's closer for us to have a GUI now, at least for Windows :)