Boot nodes refuse connection when running InitializeBootnodes() @ DiscoveryApp.cs | Optimism mainnet
Closed this issue · 3 comments
Description
Nethermind 1.28.0, every single bootnode from ChainSpec
returns connection reset RST,ACK
when attempting to contact them during normal startup procedures in Nethermind.Network.Discovery
's DiscoveryApp.cs
.
Default op-mainnet.cfg
;
Client execution command line args: -c op-mainnet -dd \"x:/xxxxxxxx\" --JsonRpc.JwtSecretFile \"x:/xxxxxxxx/jwt/jwtsecret\" --JsonRpc.Host \"x.x.x.x\" --JsonRpc.EnginePort 8552 --JsonRpc.EngineHost \"x.x.x.x\" --JsonRpc.Enabled true --HealthChecks.Enabled true --HealthChecks.UIEnabled true --Network.MaxActivePeers 250 --Pruning.Mode=Hybrid --Pruning.FullPruningTrigger=StateDbSize --Pruning.FullPruningThresholdMb=500000 --JsonRpc.EnabledModules=\"[Eth, Subscribe, Trace, TxPool, Web3, Personal, Proof, Net, Parity, Health, Rpc, Admin]\"
- Consensus Client
op-node
compiled from source (op-stack v1.9.1)
Tested on two separate systems with different WAN IPs and the same exact config:
Ubuntu 22.04/i9 14900KF/64GB RAM
Windows 10/i9 13900KF/32GB RAM
Screenshots
PingMsg
object's fields when constructed and sent:
Logs
Could not communicate with any nodes (bootnodes, trusted nodes, persisted nodes).
Since none of the nodes actually establish connection and therefore NodeLifecycleState.Active
is never set.
Bootnodes are just for discovery(UDP), still the client tries to connect to them via devp2p(TCP) to query headers and other things, and it fails, which is OK.
Also the screenshot displays PingMsg usage which is from discv4 - previous version of discovery, which is not expected, op-mainnet has Discv5 enabled. Could you confirm op-mainnet config is used?
Ah, then I suggest adding "DiscoveryVersion": "V5"
to op-mainnet.cfg
's Discovery
config object, since otherwise it wont be expressly set from any IConfigSource
and will default to V4
unless user specifies it. You probably meant to refactor this line
nethermind/src/Nethermind/Nethermind.Runner/configs/op-mainnet.cfg
Lines 24 to 26 in 1fc24b6
Indeed! This is definitely a config issue, thanks for the report! Let me make a pr