Salesforce
Closed this issue · 3 comments
Salesforce.com supports tokens and has invested in Yubico:
https://www.yubico.com/why-yubico/for-business/cloud/salesforce/
https://www.yubico.com/press-releases/30m-invested-yubico/
Please have a look at the definition note.
Dongleauth lists services that support OTP and U2F(webauthn) only.
Perhaps I'm not following, it looks like it does support U2F but also supports a few other types such as SMS, email and a dedicated app
https://help.salesforce.com/articleView?id=activating_computer.htm&type=5
If your average visitor to the site is supposed to figure out the intricacies of a paragraph in a text file on Github before making a suggestion, then I think if you are taking that same attitude to user adoption of the Nitrokey you're not exactly on to a winning formula.
Why would documenting any site that supports a dongle like the domain name "dongleauth" suggests be a problem? It will be much better than looking at a site that seems like an abandoned incomplete project.
Maybe I got you wrong. I didn't know what you are actually proposing.
From your first message, I only knew that salesforce supports yubico. A lot of services do, but that does not always qualify for a compatibility for u2f, which is used by a lot dongles. As you can see, dongleauth does have two columns: otp and u2f. I didn't know how your information should have fit in.
Thanks for the link to salesforce documentation. That makes the situation much more clearer. Would you mind to create a PR?