vocabulary parameter not needed for taxonomy searches
Opened this issue · 0 comments
MikeThacker1 commented
We have previously suggested that API searches for services matching a taxonomy term should take this syntax:
/services/?&taxonomy_id=esdServiceType:242&vocabulary=esdServiceTypes
However, API guidance now makes it clear how CURIEs should be used for all taxonomy term identifiers. So we expect taxonomy identifiers to be unique across all vocabularies.
Hence the "vocabulary" parameter should not be needed and this syntax should be sufficient:
/services/?&taxonomy_id=esdServiceType:242