PathwayCommons/factoid

X'ing submitted docs: Dos and Don'ts

jvwong opened this issue · 1 comments

jvwong commented

Description

Improvements can be made to the structure and content of newly submitted documents shared to Twitter. Ideally, we would produce more compelling content on a per-document basis ('single-user mode') by leveraging the unique and valuable information only we have access to via Biofactoid. Ultimately, we'd like to achieve some positive feedback: increasing the chances of views, re-tweets, indexing (Google) prompts others to contribute.

Some Tweet "Dos and Don'ts" to use as a guide:

Dos

Don'ts

  • Split Tweet content into multiple posts e.g. thread
  • Tag/Hashtag
    • Everything and everyone possible, as this detracts from content and looks like spam

Specification

To illustrate how we might apply these rules, I'll use a paper from eLife for which a hand-crafted Tweet was created. This paper is rather broad in scope (not just about an interaction), contains complex details, a broad range of experimental techniques and subtle conclusions.

Mockup

The mockup below is from a 'Features' series whose intention was to highlight the official recommendation by eLife in June.

Screen Shot 2023-07-20 at 2 47 23 PM

Details

Some breakdown of the above example:

  • Tag
    • journal directly (@elife) - could be automated?
    • Senior author (@@LoweLabMSKCC) - manual
  • Hastag
    • main disease (#hepatocellular)
  • Link
    • DOI, biofactoid doc in same tweet
  • Key image
    • figure - manual
jvwong commented

NEWS: X is changing how news links show up on the timeline.

It will strip out the headline/text so links display only an article’s lead image.

  • issues
    • text is elided (this stream of template interactions text was never great anyway)
    • title/caption is gone
Screenshot 2023-10-19 at 9 19 28 AM