int FloydImpl::ReplyRequestVote里面有bug么？

[peacedog123]

注释和论文里面有写：
// if votedfor is null or candidateId, and candidated's log is at least as up-to-date
// as receiver's log, grant vote

但是这个rpc实现逻辑里面，好像完全没有去判断FloydContext内部的vote_for_ip和vote_for_port, 事实是如果一个follower变成candidate后，首先会把vote_for_ip和vote_for_port设置成自己；此时如果收到RequestVoteRPC请求过来，应该直接return false, 表明自己这一轮已经投过票了（投给自己）

不知道我理解的对不对？谢谢

[gaodq]

在这里判断了

floyd/floyd/src/floyd_impl.cc

Lines 747 to 753 in 4113bef

	if (!context_->voted_for_ip.empty() || context_->voted_for_port != 0) {
	LOGV(INFO_LEVEL, info_log_, "FloydImpl::ReplyRequestVote: I %s:%d have voted for %s:%d in this term %lu",
	options_.local_ip.c_str(), options_.local_port, context_->voted_for_ip.c_str(),
	context_->voted_for_port, request_vote.term());
	BuildRequestVoteResponse(context_->current_term, granted, response);
	return -1;
	}

[peacedog123]

谢谢，pull了最新的代码后发现有了