Difference in the interface of generated js

[rom1504]

https://github.com/ProtoDef-io/node-protodef/blob/master/src/datatypes/utils.js#L135
vs
https://github.com/ProtoDef-io/node-protodefc/blob/master/lib/types/utils.js#L55

ie deserialize return [value,size] with protodefc while protodef return {value,size}

The second difference is an object {serialize,deserialize,size_of} vs an array {deserialize,serialize,size_of} but that's less important because it can be transformed after compilation without loss of performance.

It's important to have the same interface in order to use existing native types , for example https://github.com/PrismarineJS/node-minecraft-protocol/blob/master/src/datatypes/minecraft.js#L7

I don't think any of the two interfaces is better, I just think it should be the same.

Would it be a problem to make deserialize return a {value,size} in protodefc js backend ?
Does anything use protodefc js backend yet ?