Prowlarr/Indexers

Hebits indexer remove imdbid from tv-search mode

Closed this issue ยท 8 comments

Is there an existing issue for this?

  • I have searched the existing issues

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe

When searching for epsidoes from sonarr i'll get all episodes of a show because it search bu imdbid, need to use with q

Describe the solution you'd like

Please remove imdbid from tv-search mode, for example:

  modes:
    search: [q]
    tv-search: [q, season, ep]
    movie-search: [q, imdbid]
    music-search: [q]
    book-search: [q]

Describe alternatives you've considered

No alternative, see also issue in Jackett:
Jackett/Jackett#15224

Anything else?

No

FYI If you create an issue in Jackett for a shared definition with Prowlarr, there no need to create a GHI here too since we're in sync. ๐Ÿ‘

FYI If you create an issue in Jackett for a shared definition with Prowlarr, there no need to create a GHI here too since we're in sync. ๐Ÿ‘

Ohh ok great, didn't knew that...

Unless it changed jackett ignores Cardigann IMDb for tv and prowlarr does not just for context

@mynameisbogdan answering you for this comment: Jackett/Jackett#15224 (comment)

It supported imdbid and SxxEyy, but it will only query it with the imdbid.

For example, this is what sonarr will send:
http://192.168.**.***:8887/2/api?t=tvsearch&cat=5000,5030,5040,5045,5050&extended=1&apikey=(removed)&offset=0&limit=100&imdbid=tt9859436&season=1&ep=4

And this is what prowlarr will send eventually:
https://hebits.net/ajax.php?searchstr=tt9859436&order_by=time&order_way=desc&imdbgt=0&imdblt=10&action=browse&group_results=0&filter_cat[2]=1&filter_cat[3]=1

I was asking if this works:

https://hebits.net/ajax.php?searchstr=tt9859436+S01E04&order_by=time&order_way=desc&imdbgt=0&imdblt=10&action=browse&group_results=0&filter_cat[2]=1&filter_cat[3]=1

I was asking if this works:

https://hebits.net/ajax.php?searchstr=tt9859436+S01E04&order_by=time&order_way=desc&imdbgt=0&imdblt=10&action=browse&group_results=0&filter_cat[2]=1&filter_cat[3]=1

Yes this is working

Good. Thanks for the confirmation.

Thank you for the fast resolve, working great!