to be compatible with "peer" sni field
DuckSoft opened this issue · 3 comments
DuckSoft commented
Personally I think it totally nonsense to use peer for SNI.
However, it may be necessary to support the field peer, since it's used by Shadowrocket.
Users are innocent. Just don't build another wall.
Ref: Qv2ray/Qv2ray#844
Deleted user commented
@DuckSoft Peer is not a standard. That's a shit name.
Ignored, anyone who wants it supported may open a PR.
Deleted user commented
@DuckSoft Users are innocent but the shit standard isn''t.
DuckSoft commented