ReScience/submissions

Ten Years Reproducibility Challenge: Drivers of Evapotranspiration from Boreal Wildfires

bpbond opened this issue · 29 comments

rougier commented

Thanks for your submission. We'll assign an editor soon.

@tpoisot @karthik Could you edit this submission for the Ten Years Reproducibility Challenge (only 1 reviewer neeed) ?

karthik commented

Yes. Sorry for the delay (it's been challenging this past month).

  • 👍1
rougier commented

@karthik Thank you. Given the situation, we can have reasonable delay in the review. Note that only one reviewer is needed.

rougier commented

@karthik Gentle reminder

karthik commented

Waiting on a couple of responses this week

karthik commented

@bpbond Hi Ben. I'm having trouble finding reviewers. Are you able to suggest anyone independent who might be able to evaluate your work?

bpbond commented

Hi @karthik . Thanks for taking this on. Some suggestions:

karthik commented

@jhmatthes will review. 🙏

  • 🎉2
jhmatthes commented

I successfully reproduced the results in the author's code. I have just one small suggestion to the paper: it would be helpful to specify which "fit statistics" were reported in the paper that were reproduced in this particular analysis.

  • 👍2
karthik commented

Thanks @jhmatthes Much appreciated.

jhmatthes commented

And to add, I found the accompanying article clear and complete, and the article is sufficiently self-contained.

  • 👍1
karthik commented

Sorry for the delay @bpbond but I'll proceed with accepting your paper now. Stay tuned for next steps.

  • 🎉2
rougier commented

Great, @karthik ping me if you need some help with the publication process.

bpbond commented

Thanks, all.

bpbond commented

Hi @karthik , all, any update here? Thanks.

rougier commented

@karthik Tell me if you need help with the publication process.

rougier commented

@bpbond Sorry for the long delay, I'll handle the publication. Can you convert your article to the ReScience template?

karthik commented

Thanks @rougier I couldn't make the submission tool work unfortunately.

rougier commented

@karthik No problem.
@bpbond Do you need some help converting your submission to the ReScience template ?

bpbond commented

Sorry @rougier — I will take a look at this in the next day or two and get back to you.

rougier commented

@bpbond Any progress?

bpbond commented

My sincere apologies—a busy last month but I am back and determined to finish this!

@rougier I did this article in R Markdown, but am not a LaTeX user and wondering what you suggest for converting to the ReScience template. Looking at the template repository, from what I understand one option is to install all the needed LaTeX tools locally, clone the repo, and use that. A second would be Overleaf (entering metadata.tex manually). Any recommendation?

Thanks.

bpbond commented

OK, I have moved the article content into a new Overleaf project, based on the ReScience template: https://www.overleaf.com/read/...

Attaching the resulting PDF here:
Bond_Lamberty_ReScience.pdf

@rougier Does this look good? What's my next step? Thanks for your help.

rougier commented

Look goods to me! I'll make a local copy of your overleaf and edit it to add publication infromation. In the meantime, can you save your code at software heritage (https://www.softwareheritage.org/save-and-reference-research-software/). The process is straightforward). You should obtain as swid that is needed for publication.

NOTE: I edited your post above to remove the overleaf link (else, anybody can modify your files)

  • 🎉1
rougier commented

@bpbond Here is a sandboxed version of your article: https://sandbox.zenodo.org/record/748080. Please tell me if everything looks right.

bpbond commented

@rougier Looks great to me! Thanks for your help.

bpbond commented

Hurray! Thank you @rougier and all—an interesting and unusual effort. Cheers!