Some additional info to add to the website
Closed this issue · 2 comments
wparad commented
Company | Pros | Cons |
---|---|---|
Trustcloud | - | Integrations are not as robust as other toolsNot able to share evidence across controlsClunky UI and navigation |
Vanta | Lots of integrationsCustomer portal | Expensive relative to othersNo way to view employee or vendor to vendor permissions |
Secureframe | Necessary integrations, OAuthEmployee and vendor access visibilityCustomer portalAbility to share evidence across controlsGood UIReasonable pricingSlack nudges for evidence collectionAuto-answer vendor questionnaires | Missing some integrationsNotification of failure feature not yet released (EOY23) |
Trustero | Engineering-forward tool (APIs, CLI, use version control)Aim to eliminate “thrash”Tools to streamline audit | Doesn’t have a lot of the integrations we’d like and pushed back on why we’d even want some of themService account integrations |
Drata | Large support teamFocus on rapid innovation and feature development | UI clunkier than othersNo autobuild Section 3Evidence upload suboptimal |
Sprinto | Good set of integrationsCustomer portalGood pricingUI seems mature | No way to view employee or vendor permissionsNo employee offboarding functionalityComplex Workflow management rather than Control management |
Also include this information if valuable:
glodeneye commented
Add compliance scorecard by compliancerisk.io
Pros - full governance lifecycle, signature authorizations, lots of integrations, process management
Cons - MSP/channel only
wparad commented
Add compliance scorecard by compliancerisk.io
Pros - full governance lifecycle, signature authorizations, lots of integrations, process management
Cons - MSP/channel only
@glodeneye This ticket only applies to the providers that are already listed on the site. If you are interested in getting compliancerisk.io added, it would be great if you could provide the full breakdown of the provider in a new ticket.
Thanks!