StrikerRockers-Mods/VanillaTweaks

[1.18.2] Enchantments reporting their max levels as 0

Closed this issue · 3 comments

Hello there. It has come to my attention that you are using max level 0, in order to disable enchantments. I would like to ask whether it is a common practice or something that you thought of. That is, because unsuspecting mods may use the max level of an enchantment for something other than figuring out whether a book can be updated.

This fact came to my attention after realising Lllamarama has been getting a lot of crashing issues. After looking into the matter, I realised it's only vanilla tweaks reporting invalid enchantment levels.

We are planning on fixing the issue on our side, however I thought it would be important to let you know.
I hope we can achieve a better solution wherever possible together.

The discussion about the aforementioned case can be found here: LlamaramaTeam/Llamarama#15

Please let us know about the way you feel about it. We are glad to collaborate with you. Thank you for your time!

Hi, sorry to hear that my code may be the culprit causing your code to crash.
I use max lvl 0 to disable enchantments instead of not registering them due to forge's policy on deregistering/not registering stuff after config load. Another factor is registry changes by mojang in 1.18.2. Also to my knowledge this is the first time its breaking a mod.

As I use multi-loader I try my best to make code common enough for both loaders. If you can think of any other solution other than using 0 max lvl which would be compatible with forge and fabric Let me know.

My discord server link if you want to talk further. https://discord.gg/tqcqeSj

I use max lvl 0 to disable enchantments instead of not registering them due to forge's policy on deregistering/not registering stuff after config load.

Yeah I figured you'd have trouble doing that in another way. I will handle 0 as a max level as a common practice and just filter out those mods when parsing the registry, since I don't see any other reason that would happen. This will also prevent any issues when creating invalid enchantment books from disabled enchantments.. I feel like that will help prevent similar issues in the future.