We need more reviewers
GarboMuffin opened this issue · 14 comments
In order for unsandboxed extensions to thrive, we're going to need more people involved in reviewing the extensions. Having everything be bottlenecked on me will not scale.
I can provide help, I can do some review, discuss issues, suggest code, just what I've been doing. The only problem is I'm still getting familiar with scratch's internals and vm, so I can't really review something that is closely related to it.
I'll help. however I'm not available most of the time FYI
I can help too. I am familiar with JS and I already developed some extensions. I am actually working on adacraft, but I can help and correct extension.
I can help!
There is no need to proclaim yourself as a helper. If you want to help, then do things like test extensions and report any issues, etc. That's how you can actually help.
ah
There is no need to proclaim yourself as a helper. If you want to help, then do things like test extensions and report any issues, etc. That's how you can actually help.
Ok. I will do it.
me
me
There is no need to proclaim yourself as a helper. If you want to help, then do things like test extensions and report any issues, etc. That's how you can actually help.
you could make a system where there's a queue for the custom extensions, and all of the custom extensions that are going to get in the queue get checked by some algorithm before letting it in the queue, and once the extension becomes first in the queue, then it gets checked by you and gets uploaded. this should make it so that there are less extensions being moderated by you, as they should have been catched by the algorithm or AI (whatever you want to use). and if you find one that didn't get moderated by the AI correctly, then you can just improve the algorithm and maybe add the extension hash to a blacklist.
And optionally, you can make another section in the extension area saying "Potentially dangerous extensions that are currently being reviewed" which will show all of the extensions that are in the queue and passed the AI test, and will be reviewed by you and the other moderators if there are
you could make a system where there's a queue for the custom extensions, and all of the custom extensions that are going to get in the queue get checked by some algorithm before letting it in the queue, and once the extension becomes first in the queue, then it gets checked by you and gets uploaded. this should make it so that there are less extensions being moderated by you, as they should have been catched by the algorithm or AI (whatever you want to use). and if you find one that didn't get moderated by the AI correctly, then you can just improve the algorithm and maybe add the extension hash to a blacklist. And optionally, you can make another section in the extension area saying "Potentially dangerous extensions that are currently being reviewed" which will show all of the extensions that are in the queue and passed the AI test, and will be reviewed by you and the other moderators if there are
Can you even do that in github?
you could make a system where there's a queue for the custom extensions, and all of the custom extensions that are going to get in the queue get checked by some algorithm before letting it in the queue, and once the extension becomes first in the queue, then it gets checked by you and gets uploaded. this should make it so that there are less extensions being moderated by you, as they should have been catched by the algorithm or AI (whatever you want to use). and if you find one that didn't get moderated by the AI correctly, then you can just improve the algorithm and maybe add the extension hash to a blacklist. And optionally, you can make another section in the extension area saying "Potentially dangerous extensions that are currently being reviewed" which will show all of the extensions that are in the queue and passed the AI test, and will be reviewed by you and the other moderators if there are
Can you even do that in github?
If you are able to automatically edit files or just have it done manually, then yes, it should be possible
(also, now that i have more knowledge of how to make extensions, you could make it so that the "Potentially dangerous extensions" thing includes sandboxed extensions)
I will review extensions for you! I'd love to! I use turbowarp.org a lot, even though I am a web developer (I love the art editor and ease of use for animating). Just let me know and I'd be glad to do it.
I will review extensions for you! I'd love to! I use turbowarp.org a lot, even though I am a web developer (I love the art editor and ease of use for animating). Just let me know and I'd be glad to do it.
There is no need to proclaim yourself as a helper. If you want to help, then do things like test extensions and report any issues, etc. That's how you can actually help.