Bibliography style is not compatible with `natbib`
gw0 opened this issue · 1 comments
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
For bibliography natbib in numerical mode is used, but features from that library can not be used (natbib docs). For example \citet{jon90} should result in Jones et al. [21], but instead (author?) [21] appears and a warning like:
Package natbib Warning: Author undefined for citation`jon90'
(natbib) on page 6 on input line 115.
Describe the solution you'd like
I would expect that \citet and \citep work as described for the natbib library.
Describe alternatives you've considered
The problem is that the FRIteza.bst bibliography style is based on unsrt.bst, which is NOT compatible with natbib. Instead it should be based upon unsrtnat.bst (link) or plainnat.bst.
There are no warnings when these bibliography styles are used, but the appearance changes:
\bibliographystyle{unsrtnat}
Additional context
MiKTeX 2.9.6980 on Debian 9.8.